Okay, so we're firstmost faithful and loyal fans, both to Stephenie Meyer's Twilight book series and now to the new Twilight movie (and soon New Moon!)

As the Twilight purists we are, we hereby present to you the three most idiotic reviews of the Twilight movie.

Idiotic Review #1 - Chicago Reader compares Twilight to WB sitcom

J.R. Jones of the Chicago Reader misses the depth of what he's seeing:

This adaptation of the best-selling novel by Stephenie Meyer never rises above the level of a teen soaper on the WB network, and its pale, sulky boy toys (Kellan Lutz, Peter Facinelli, Jackson Rathbone) are more silly than scary.

Read the full (idiotic) review here.

Idiotic Review #2 - Eonline.com says Twilight is Sexist

Showing complete ignorance for what makes Twilight truly Twilight, Eonline proclaims:

Back to Twilight, which hit on all mattress-ready moods save one: It’s sexist. Why are all the boy vampires the driving, dynamic, more droolworthy ones? Why is Bella’s greatest achievement to be bedded by Edward? Why the hell isn’t she bedding who she pleases, and deciding when?

Read the full (idiotic) review here.

Idiotic Review #3 - New York Post says Twilight was Made for 12-year Olds

Kyle Smith of the New York Post doesn't get it either. There were so many clueless statements that you'll just have to read the full article because we could only fit in a few here:

TWELVE-year-old girls have a lot to answer for: Clay Aiken, exclamation-point abuse, "Twilight." What's more worrying, though, is how the bubble-gum lip-glossers seem to rule national taste standards...

In "Twilight," the vamps work off the tension of permanent un-deadness and social ostracization by . . . playing baseball? Is that really the most interesting way to show off their super-strength and speed? The ballgame in this movie, played in Abner Doubleday/"Eight Men Out" uniforms, is the weirdest sporting use of superpowers since Batman and Robin played hockey with Mr. Freeze.

Read the full (idiotic) review here.